Everyone knows that Earth is bi-polar. And many people (not all) are aware that Polar Bears inhabit the Arctic region and adjacent areas (Canada, Greenland, Norway, Russia) of the northern hemisphere, but are not found in the southern hemisphere; while conversely Penguins are to be found exclusively in the Antarctic and adjacent areas (Chile, Falklands, New Zealand) of the southern hemisphere but are not found in the northern hemisphere. So never the twain shall meet, except in zoos.
![]() |
one cool polaroid glasses wearing Polar Bear |
Antarctic also comes from a Greek word ἀνταρκτική, antarktiké, literally opposite the bear. It follows the Greek rule of putting ἀντι, anti, in front of nouns to indicate their opposite, as in the naming of pairs of islands such as Paros and Antiparos, or phenomena such as cyclone and anticyclone. It simply denoted that region of the earth opposite the northern pole and it's quite serendipitous that the frozen southern region is actually devoid of bears.
However, the real inspiration for bringing together these creatures from opposite ends of the Earth in my polarity blog was a couple of articles in the Guardian some time ago, that have lingered in memory.
![]() |
several cool Emperor Penguins sniffing the air |
Rebecca from Leicester opined that there are probably too many land-based predators in the Arctic apart from bears, and the penguins would struggle to sustain numbers. Alexandra informed us that penguins had been introduced northwards in the early 20th century, but indeed the arctic foxes, mink, stoats and wolves had made short work of the breeding grounds, leaving nothing for polar bears to get their teeth into. Olly was more philosophical in stating that ninety-nine per cent of species that have ever existed are now extinct (was he exaggerating?), and that is usually due to a change in environment. It would happen to the polar bears one day, and to the penguins as well. The value in postponing their extinction seemed to him debatable.
The second was an article about declining polar bear numbers, which stood at between twenty and thirty thousand as of 2015, the rapidly diminishing area of sea ice on which they live, and their seeming inability to adjust in large numbers. Some hundreds have adapted to land-living and a land-based diet in places like northern Canada but for the majority they are trying to survive on both a reduced ice field and a reduced diet as populations of fish and seals also decline. It would appear that if anyone needs to be moving anywhere, it should be the polar bears, heading south for the Antarctic. What do you reckon?
Here's my latest poem, a work-in-progress about contrapolarity, and loosely connected to theme.
Here's my latest poem, a work-in-progress about contrapolarity, and loosely connected to theme.
Pay Attention
Sugared his wounds that bleed that gape
dripping sticky onto the spread pages
of the Journal of Affective Disorders -
a piece about the role of mood markers
in plasma, the Eveningness chronotype
and irritable affective temperaments -
all theory of little consolation to a man
just stabbed by his wife with the knife
that had sliced through her birthday cake.
Turning 30 is a bitch at the best of times.
Thanks for reading, S ;-)
3 comments:
Haha!! You always use our little quips to make us think. Bravo Steve
I'm sad for the polar bears.
I've heard that suggestion before, send penguins north and/or polar bears south. Of either option, sending bears south looks the more realistic. Worth a try? That's a poem from the dark side!
Post a Comment