written and posted by members of Lancashire Dead Good Poets' Society

Showing posts with label leo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label leo. Show all posts

Tuesday, 9 April 2024

Furthest, Fairest Things

Furthest, fairest things, stars, free of our humbug,
each his own, the longer known the more alone,
wrapt in emphatic fire roaring out to a black flue.

                                                                   Basil Bunting, 'Briggflatts'

When I was was a kid, somebody bought me The Observer's Book of Astronomy, one of many books written on the subject by the late Patrick Moore. I was intrigued by the pictures of constellations, although I must admit I spent more time looking at the book than into the night sky. More than once, I must've thought it would be interesting to be an astronomer, but I was lousy at maths and just don't have the sort of mind that's good at remembering long lists of names (I tried a few times to memorise the main features on the moon, but they never stuck).

Years later, when I moved to the Yorkshire Dales, I found myself living in an area free of light pollution. For most of my life, the sky had been no more than an orange haze. All of a sudden, there was so much to see.

I got hold of a star map (the Observer's Book had disappeared a long time ago) and actually managed to memorise a few constellations: Orion, Cassiopeia, Taurus, Cygnus, Auriga, Draco, Leo. It felt good, being able to recognise them, just as it did to know the names of the local hills. And it's not just the constellations: there's a lot of other things up there you can discover without a telescope, too. Peripheral vision is more sensitive to light than central vision. You may know this trick already, but if you don't, try looking just to one side of the second star in the handle of The Plough (look at it out of the corner of your eye, in other words) and you can see there are, in fact, two stars. A binary system. (In fact, there are four stars, but only two are visible to the naked eye). 


Talking of such things, Andromeda, I discovered, is a good constellation to know: the Andromeda Nebula (M31 pictured above) is the nearest major galaxy to our own and if you can recognise the constellation, it's easy to locate the nebula from it. If you know where to look on a very dark night, you can just make it out in the corner of your eye. Binoculars reveal it to be a mysterious-looking smudge. As for seeing our own, the Milky Way Galaxy, we're in it, of course, but as everybody knows, at the right time of year on a dark night you can see the distant, inner part of it as a long, silvery band stretched out across the sky. When it's really dark in the Dales, you can even make out the dust-clouds near it's centre. It's like your standing on the outskirts of a forest, staring into its depths: the stars you see when you look up are the foreground, the individual trees that immediately surround you; the distant band of the Milky Way, the green-brown haze of the more distant trees that merge into a single mass. 

Of the constellations I learned to spot, one of the ones that most resembles the thing it's supposed to depict has to be Leo. For those who don't know it, the prominent group of stars known as the Sickle is clearly the lion's mane. Look behind it and all the other parts of the beast readily fall into place. Once seen, never forgotten.


The thing is, though, any intelligent species living on a planet orbiting the star Denebola would have no idea that their sun was, to us, a lion's back end, that the ancient Egyptians worshipped the constellation – which they called knem – or that the ancient Greeks associated it with the Nemean lion, a monster killed by Hercules. And it would never occur to them that superstitious Earthlings today think that if their sun is in the same part of the sky as our sun when someone is born, it makes that person ambitious and confident. I'm assuming here that this species has optical vision, not unlike our own, cultures, myths and languages we might recognise and are able to see the night sky much as we see it. These are big assumptions. They may, of course, have completely different ways of perceiving the presence of our star and ascribe it a significance we can't even begin to imagine. Nevertheless, it makes you wonder. It begs the question, if our sun is a visible star in the night sky of other intelligent species, what cultural significance, if any, do they attribute to our star? Are we, without knowing it, orbiting the body part of some mythological alien animal?

We might, of course, be of significance to more than one civilisation – and on more than one planet. I say 'be' but which tense we should use begins to get very complicated when we start contemplating these things. All that we do know, whichever planet we live on, is that star-light takes centuries to reach us and, whatever significance we might ascribe to each other's home-stars, all of our species probably exist for a mere blink of a cosmic eye. I say probably, because our lives are mere snapshots of evolution: we're still evolving. Who's to say what we're evolving into? And who's to say what other species elsewhere in the universe, perhaps millions of years ahead of us, have already become? As for the stars, though, as Basil Bunting put it:

Then is Now. The star you steer by is gone,
its tremulous thread spun in the hurricane
spider floss on my cheek

                                                                        Ibid.

I wrote this poem below a few years ago. It was first published in The Passionate Transitory magazine which, sadly, though passionate in its promotion of poetry, itself turned out to be transitory. I think, when I wrote it, Pluto was still a planet. Don't get me going on that.


News from Pluto

Something's about to happen. I'm not sure what.
I've watched for long enough and, yes, I get
Impatient, as the months slip by. And yet
This is important. In a way, I'm not.
Earth, erratic, crosses the ecliptic;
By day, the sun's scarce bigger than a star:
It makes you realise just how small we are.
Will I get home? I must be realistic.
Gravity's low. Perhaps my bones grow thin.
I jog the corridors, try to keep fit,
But face the fact (there's no escaping it)
I have become this waiting game I'm in.
One day, it'll happen, I've no doubt.
Exactly when, I don't know. I'll find out.

Dominic Rivron

Saturday, 4 February 2023

In The Shadows

When you reach your biblical "three score years and ten" as I do today gentle reader, (and yes, there was cake for breakfast), the subconscious mind can be forgiven a quick peek  in the shadows  just in case Grimmy himself might be lurking there, scythe at the ready for a spot of reaping.


Of course I'm being facetious, flippant even. I trust I've a good few more birthdays to come yet, but take nothing for granted, being mindful of the fact that all four of my grandparents died in their sixties and my mother didn't make it beyond seventy-two. Still, people live longer in the 21st century, don't they? Come on! 💀

Dismissing reflections on mortality, I'm also celebrating another milestone today, this being the 400th Dead Good Saturday blog. It's funny how things turn out. I only started writing them because I didn't have the time back in 2014 to devote to my novel-in-progress (which still hasn't advanced very far). However, blogging has been fun. It's got me researching and writing about lots of topics I would never have broached otherwise, and I hope you've been enjoying the journey as much as I have. By the way, if you're late to the party (so to speak) and would like to catch up, they are all still out on the website just waiting for you. Link here to access at your leisure >>>  The 400

Anyway, to the subject in hand... I've sat in the shadows at my local cinema on two occasions recently and by coincidence watched films that have both referenced the fact that the illusion of the "motion pictures" we so enjoy is a trick effected by projecting still images at the rate of twenty-four frames per second (24fps). 'Empire Of Light' and 'The Fabelmans' are the movies in question, both excellent and well worth viewing - for best effect on the big screen if you get the chance. The latter, Spielberg's homage to his family and origins, is up for a clutch of Oscars. The former, directed by Sam Mendes and deserving of huge accolades for everyone involved (especially the acting of Olivia Coleman and Micheal Ward), has been nominated in just a single category, cinematography. Shame on the parochial Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.

When viewing frames on a reel of film, most human beings are capable of seeing the images as distinct and separate up to a speed of around 10 to 12 frames per second. Any faster than that and the brain begins to see motion, a continuous moving image instead of a series of stills. That's the magic. A frame rate of 24fps was discovered to be optimum some hundred years ago and has been the industry standard ever since. It's the speed at which cameras shoot and the speed at which projectors play back. 

35mm film stock, again the industry standard for most feature films, consists of a series of 16mm x 22mm image panels interleaved with 3mm separators, with traction perforations along each outside edge and with the optical soundtrack encoded on the operation side, as in the diagram below.


Of course, we never register the separators, those black lines flashing up every 16mm of film, 24 of them every second, 1,440 per minute, 125,000 of them during an average-length movie: that's 375 metres of darkness passing before our eyes! 

It is often rumoured by conspiracy theorists that the occasional frame containing a subversive message gets edited into what we see, to condition us without our realising it. But just think of what could be encoded, fragmented, or just lurking subliminally in the black light of the interstices in a reel of film. It's an intriguing (though admittedly unlikely) speculation that the celluloid helix of our story world could also be flashing secret messages to us, like so many ciphers on a succession of rapidly passing telegraph poles.


Spool up the latest rushes from the Imaginarium...(It's a weird piece and will no doubt be subject to some post-production editing):

Who Goes There?
What goes down 
in the shadowlands,
a darkness interposed
between each rectangle
of light like fence-posts
or telegraph poles as seen
from e.g. a moving train
speeding to 'The End',
or perhaps a skateboard
as blithe Zoe zips down
Old Hollywood Lane
while taking the lion
of least resistance out
on his daily run because
poor Leo lost his pride
the day he growled
on camera, 
for if a photograph 
can steal a soul, 
just reckon what
24 per second does...
those black bars 
between frames 
are the ciphers
of his shame.







As a fanfare of sorts, here's Joni Mitchell supported by The Band singing Shadows And Light (from the latter's farewell gig at San Francisco's Winterland in 1975).

Thanks for reading, S ;-)

Monday, 23 July 2012

Lions.

21:53:00 Posted by Shaun , , , , , , , 1 comment
Rarr.

Today is Leo day. The day for all my fellow summer borns to rejoice in having our star sign in power. Or something like that.

I don't believe in star signs really. They probably have more significance than I think. They probably also have more significance than a lot of the religious stuff people live their lives by. I still have to be a little pessimistic though- after all, the last place I want to be is a drunken dial away from a Psychic hotline and major phone bill.

That said, I had to find something to write here for the blog. Something about characters and how star signs could be an interesting way to develop them- for traits and whatnot was the first idea I had. Then the golf started and, in truth, I couldn't be bothered. I barely found time to get to my allotment, despite having a constant reminder of how perfect the conditions were courtesy of BBC's live coverage from down the road. I did start to develop a poem idea though- something along the lines of big game hunting is the thinking so watch this space.

So that is me really. I'm a Leo and, in reading back over those bits at the top, reckon that pretty much sums me up- strong willed but very much an 'I'll do it when I want' kind of person. Well, unless the phone rings tomorrow and something I would actually like to do happens (hint hint ANYONE!).

Whilst researching my meagre blog post, I did find this peach in Take A Break's Fate and Fortune Magazine. You'll be surprised to know it also applies to pets, not just Shauns.

"...born under Leo are masters of all they survey. Proud, loving and loyal, your Leo pet likes to rule the roost, loves being the centre of attention and adores cuddles. They're sunny, cheerful and can seem lazy- but a snoozing Leo pet is a happy one.
DO: Groom them often. They can't get enough of being pampered. If there was a pet spa, they'd be first in the queue.
DON'T: Laugh at your pet if they do something silly. They're very proud."

(taken from: TAB Fate & Fortune, issue August 2012).

Thanks for reading,
S