written and posted by members of Lancashire Dead Good Poets' Society

Saturday, 26 February 2022

Ukraine

I was planning to take a break from blogging this week. Then Putin ordered the Russian invasion of Ukraine and suddenly the imperative is there to try and respond in words to the horror that such a despicable act of war-mongering has unleashed.

Not that the blatant act of aggression was unexpected. Russia (i.e. Putin) had been building up to it for months by ratcheting up the propaganda, the intimidating threats, the military manoeuvres, the rhetoric - all that bogus "Russians and Ukrainians are one people" bollocks that Vlad the Invader has been spouting. 

His own people live in fear of the man in the Kremlin who has been openly lamenting the demise of the old Soviet empire (USSR). The ex-KGB officer (and second-rate spy) was stationed in East Germany when the Berlin Wall came down in 1989. But it should be lost on no one that most of the constituent states of the old Soviet Union and its political extension the Warsaw Pact were more than happy to escape the clutches of Mother Russia at the start of the 21st century. Those in Europe celebrated their new found freedom by applying to join the EU and NATO. Ukraine was among them after the 'Orange Revolution' of 2004  sought to block the progress of the Kremlin's chosen candidate to the Ukrainian presidency. 

For a while I hoped that Russia would transform into a modern European democracy - fat chance as it turned out. Putin, schooled in that old Cold War mindset, with the complicity of Russia's new Barons,  has been steadily consolidating his authoritarian position and pursuing his dream to turn back time and Make Russia Great Again at the centre of an empire of Slavic states, and has been sounding more like a toxic cocktail of Hitler and Stalin with every passing month as the peoples of Eastern Europe moved further away from his world-view. Even Belarus tried to break away a couple of years ago and their Moscow-backed dictator resorted to violence against his own people in order to retain power after he lost the national elections.

Apart from having his eye on its strategic position and vast mineral wealth, Putin's great fear concerning Ukraine is that it was on the path to eradicating the corrupt and repressive practices that had so legitimised the power-hold Russia was able to exercise over satellite states for the best part of a century. Its people were rejecting Russia, were espousing democratic and liberal ideals, were taking steps to address right-wing factionalism and were looking west to Europe to become part of a different union. Not only would that be a huge setback to Putin's own vision for a new Slavic hegemony but it would provide an enticing example on Russia's doorstep of life beyond the stultifying dictatorship of a demagogue.

And so, with the Winter Olympics out of the way (because Putin didn't wish to embarrass his ally China), he pressed the button on the invasion he always pretended wouldn't happen. He tried to provoke Ukraine into giving him a pretence to invade by having the Russian-backed separatists step up their shelling campaign in the east of the country, but when the Ukrainian army refused to retaliate he grew frustrated, declared he was recognising two regions of  eastern Ukraine as separate states and fabricated "evidence of murderous aggression" against the minority of pro-Russian peoples in Donbas as his excuse for sending Russian troops into a sovereign state - a clear act of war. 

He may have professed "fraternal love" for the people of Ukraine and he may have been trying to convince himself that Russians and Ukrainians are one people, but the clear message from Ukraine is simple: 'Fuck off out of our country and leave us alone.' If Ukrainians didn't hate the Russian State before Putin started to put the squeeze on them, they certainly do now, and it is clear they will fight to defend their country, their democracy, their right to self-determination with every means at their disposal. The future is uncertain, but the rest of the world must surely do everything possible to support the Ukrainian cause, to minimise bloodshed and to reduce Putin and his puppets to pariahs on the world stage. Ukraine doesn't deserve this shit.

the future is uncertain
I don't easily write poems under pressure, so this poem will almost certainly be subject to refinement over time. It's partly inspired (tangentially) by a Gang Of Four song (see below). For now here goes.

Love Like Anthrax
Who would hack at the sunflower,
let him take heed. Your gunships
might strafe our skin, your tanks
ride roughshod over our bones,
cruise missiles pierce our heart,
your fog of war sear our lungs,
your embrace around our throat
attempt to squeeze freedom out.
But your misguided attentions,
your brute attempt to deflower, we
unrequite unreservedly. As one body
we reject your love like anthrax.
Our soul is steely and our hatred
will haunt you to your barren grave.

I'm including as a musical bonus a link to the signature song from the mighty Gang Of Four's debut EP 'Damaged Goods'  as the mood and words of that song of 1979 seem entirely fitting in 2022. "Woke up this morning desperation AM...". Click on the link to play: Love Like Anthrax

Thanks for reading, S. #WeStandWithUkraine 💙💛

Thursday, 24 February 2022

The Climb

The 1953 British Mount Everest expedition was the ninth mountaineering expedition to attempt the first ascent of Mount Everest and the first confirmed to have succeeded when Tenzing Norgay and Edmund Hillary reached the summit on 29 May 1953. Led by Colonel John Hunt  it was organised and financed by the Joint Himalayan Committee. News of the expedition's success reached London in time to be released on the morning of Queen Elizabeth II's coronation on the 2nd of June that year.

Edmund Hillary was a New Zealander and a beekeeper. Tenzing Norgay, a Nepalese Sherpa guide. He buried sweets and biscuits at the summit as a Buddhist offering to the gods. Hillary took several photographs of the scenery and of Tenzing waving flags representing Britain, Nepal, the UN and India. They looked for signs of George Mallory and Andrew "Sandy" Irvine who had disappeared in 1924 in a similar attempt to conquer Everest but found nothing. 

Hillary described the peak, which is 29,028 feet above sea level, as a symmetrical, beautiful snow cone summit. Hunt and Edmund Hillary were knighted on their return. Tenzing Norgay was awarded The George Medal. 

So began the race to the top. On the 50th anniversary of the ascent in 2003, over 1,300 people had reached the summit of the 'roof of the world'. 

In 1962, my parents  moved us to a pub in Maghull near Liverpool. The brand new build was named The Everest and was in an area where all the street names were based on the 1953 expedition. Hunt Road, Hillary Crescent, Tenzing Avenue. I suppose it was one of the very first themed pubs,  All over the walls were photographs, plaster made to look like sections of mountain, climbing axes, crampons and flags. 

My Dad was a skilled cocktail bartender so he invented drinks to suit the theme. An Everest, (turquoise blue with a foamy top), and a red, white and blue Union Jack, (all the colours in stripes of different specific gravity liqueurs). He was very creative. 

The pub became favourite haunt for the Everton Football team and on weekdays during school holidays, I met most of them. Ray Wilson, Tommy wright, Alex Scot. Alex Young, Brian Harris, Colin Harvey, Derek Temple, Mike Trebilcock, Brian Labone, Jimmy Gabriel, Gordon West, What a team - FA Cup winners 1966. And that was before Alan Ball joined the side. 

I had a serious bicycle accident, was concussed and spent three days in hospital. When I was discharged, several of them came to see me. They even bought me a huge box of chocolates. Naturally, I have been Evertonian ever since, I can see parallels for the current team with the 1953 Everest expedition as they now languish near the relegation zone of the Premier League. They will have a tough climb to mid-table and out of trouble, I hope that new manager Frank Lampard proves to be an effective Sherpa. Win or lose I will l always be true blue. 




Thanks for reading. Adele

  

Saturday, 19 February 2022

Love Bites!

You know how sometimes I like to take a novel or unexpected approach to the weekly blog theme? Now that Valentine's Day is safely out the way, and the consecutive Singles Awareness Day (can you believe it?), I thought we could head over to the dark side of amour - although the origins of Valentine's Day were dark enough (if you care to check that out).

I am a long time fan of the Rivers Of London series of fantasy novels by Ben Aaronovitch, (ninth in the series due in April actually), and it was when I was reading 'Moon Over Soho'  back in 2012 that I first came across some bizarre folklore that (although surely apocryphal) must rate as the ultimate in love bitesI can't not shock you, because that's the nature of the phenomenon, so let's just get stuck in. 

If you're unfamiliar with the novels, DC Peter Grant is a crime-fighting London bobby with a difference, for the premise of the books is that magic exists, can be used for nefarious ends and the Met has a special division responsible for investigating and dealing with any criminal activity that has a whiff of the supernatural about it. Chief Inspector Nightingale (wizard) and sidekick DC Peter Grant (apprentice wizard) are the heat on the streets of the capital, with sharp noses for vestigia, sensory traces of wrong-doing involving magic.

In 'Moon Over Soho', Grant gets summoned to a crime scene in the West End's Groucho Club (private members only!) where a male victim has bled to death in the toilets after having his todger bitten off. Grant has been called in by the regular Met police because of the unusual 'feel' of the crime scene and the bizarre nature of the man's wounds, reminiscent of a previous case involving the supernatural, in which a victim's manhood had been excised by sharp teeth, the configuration of which a bemused forensic dentist opined "looked remarkably like a human mouth, only shallower and with a vertical orientation". 

The chilling conclusion was that the man in the Groucho Club had also been in the throes of intercourse with a woman (or at least something that looked like a woman from the Club's CCTV images) when she bit his penis off using her vagina dentata, a term apparently coined by Sigmund Freud. (Now there's a surprise!) What a gruesome concept; the stuff of nightmares if you're a man and possibly of revenge fantasies if you're a woman wronged.

 And no, I'm not going to include an illustration of "a woman with teeth in her fanny" as Aaranovitch's DS Miriam Stephanopoulos so graphically termed it. (Best left to the imagination, I think.) Instead, here's a rather spooky tableau of some mannequins in the woods - just because it's such an intriguing photograph, and not entirely unconnected to the mood and theme of the above-going. 


Putting scruples aside, I researched briefly the concept of vagina dentata for this blog about love bites and here is what I found. The teethed vagina is fairly universal in mythologies and probably arose either as a cautionary tale against men forcing themselves on strange women, or out of deep-rooted male fears of women's sexuality, a sort of emasculation complex (as Freud would have it). There are strange tales of toothed vaginas from North and South American folklore, African, Arabic, Asian and Australasian literature and even Hindi religious texts, though they don't appear to exist in European folk tales for some reason. They all involve teeth which either grow in the vagina or dentures that have been inserted for the purpose of biting men where it hurts. The possibility of encountering a set of "obsidian sharp" teeth in a lover's "jewel box" might well have proved a passion dampener! Or a pre-emptive rumour against molestation or rape. Needless to say, I don't have a favourite tale. And of course there is absolutely no medical evidence to support the notion of vagina dentata.

It turns out there's a cult horror movie 'Teeth'  (Mitchell Lichtenstein, 2007) based around the same premise. Maybe that was Ben Aaranovitch's inspiration for building it into his novel.

I couldn't leave you on such a disturbing note in this week dominated by all things loved up. So to finish more sweetly, here's a humorous little poem begun on the coach back from Cardiff this evening (and maybe a work in progress if I get further inspired). It was partly suggested by the recent TV series 'The Larkins' (based in turn on H.E. Bates' novel 'The Darling Buds Of May') and the joyfully affectionate relationship between Pa Larkin (Bradley Walsh) and the voluptuously roly-poly Ma Larkin (Joanna Scanlan). Here goes...

Love Hearts  
Plump at fifty but still happily in love,
by mutual consent the scales gather dust
under their sagging love nest, this sweet
mountain of a woman and her doughty
pre-diabetic mountaineer of a swive.

Age has merely fleshed out a passion
for each other and wine and chocolates
in bed, now the kids have safely fled
and they have time to indulge their hearts
delights and pills to help them thrive.


That's all, folks. Thanks as ever for reading my stuff. It's been a long old football away day at the end of a tiringly windy week. I think I might be due a holiday from the blog for a couple of Saturdays, but I'll be back. 

Love and hugs, S ;-) 

Wednesday, 16 February 2022

Life Cycle of a Love Bite

07:00:00 Posted by Jill Reidy Red Snapper Photography , , , , 8 comments
Staggering, I know, but I’m no expert on modern sexual practices - in fact, I’m not sure I ever was - but I do know a love bite when I see one. And, having given it some thought, and done my own rudimentary research (sneaking looks at young teens’ necks as I pass) I come to the conclusion that they’re a bit of a no-no these days.

How wrong can you be? Confidently, I messaged the family on the communal WhatsApp, asking whether love bites are currently in fashion. I should have known I wouldn’t get a sensible answer. The first to respond was my husband, with, ‘Yes, I get loads.’ I ignored that, deciding that (a) I’d never seen any on him and (b) good luck to anybody who ventures near enough to hoover his neck. Other replies were equally silly (I’m not naming names as they all now have responsible jobs). Eventually, my teacher son said he spots love bites on some of the teens in his classes (no chance to cover up in PE). His response is always to ask if they’ve been hit by low flying golf balls. He thinks they'll be amused. I don’t need to describe the looks they give him in response. My PC daughter backed up the theory that, in her experience, love bites are really only for young teen lovers.

I’m guessing it was the same in my day. If my memory serves me right, I think I only ever received one. I was about fourteen and it was a pretty traumatic experience. I’d just been enjoying a good old teenage snog in the back row of the cinema, when his lips abruptly pulled away from mine and latched onto my tender young neck. If I hadn’t been so shocked I’d have screamed and run out. As it was, I was rooted to the seat. However, the physical pain was nothing to the mental worry when I finally managed to extricate myself and slink off to the toilet to look in the mirror. I knew my new neck decoration wouldn’t go down too well with my - albeit pretty liberal - parents.


I ditched the boyfriend, and for the next few days, polo neck jumpers, huge collars, and chiffon scarves soon became very popular in our house. What I lost in fashion credibility, I gained in peace of mind. The bruising gradually changed from red to purple, to yellow and green. I cursed that boy. The angry mark was taking a long time to completely disappear, and the scarves were become claustrophobic.

I thought I’d got away with it till I was emerging from the shower one day, wrapped in a dressing gown, hair up in a towel, about to scoot across the landing to the safety of my bedroom. Dad was coming up the stairs, his eyes just about level with my neck. I recall his double-take as I threw myself into the bedroom and slammed shut the door. I sat on the bed, dreading the expected knock. I heard the toilet flush, then dad descend the stairs. I breathed a sigh of relief and pulled on a polo neck.

That evening, as I said my good nights, dad looked up from his paper. ‘You’d better check your bed,’ he said. Puzzled, I stared at him. ‘I think you might have bed bugs.’ Pointedly, he rubbed the side of his neck, and a grin spread across his face, ‘They can give nasty bites.’ I was horrified, and probably blushed a deeper shade of red than even the original love bite.
‘Night, love,’ he said, returning to his paper.
‘Night, dad,’ I managed, ‘Errr, I wouldn’t mention bed bugs to mum, she’ll only worry.’ xxx


Life Cycle of a Love Bite

It’s not on the curriculum
Life cycle of a love bite
I do my own study
inspecting my neck
at regular intervals
I’m hoping its life is short
and painless
Always fascinated
by form and colour
each night I squint
at its reflection
directing the spotlight
at its epicentre
as a scientist might look
through a microscope
at slides of mysterious things
To start, its shape is random
its colour, angry red
mirroring my mood
Slowly, shape and shades
morph and fade
Purple, green, orange, yellow
All colours that I love
but best displayed elsewhere
Day 6, the life cycle of a love bite
is coming to an end

One last lingering look
before the scarves are ditched

Thanks for reading.......Jill

Tuesday, 15 February 2022

Love Bites - Blotting My Copy Book

 

I had done what my dad would refer to as ‘Blotted my copy book’. I’d been there before but this time I’d excelled myself in the ‘What has she done now?’ misdemeanours and no amount of wide-eyed fictional protesting could talk me out of this situation or lessen the impact.

Returning home after two weeks away in Europe with school friends, I was exhausted after a lengthy over-land journey but still on a high and buzzing with enthusiasm to share thoughts on where I’d been. I thought they, my family, would be pleased to see me. I was naïve. Worse, I’d been stupid. Caught up in a moment fuelled by Slivovitz and the sultry, open air discotheque and, yes, of course it was my own fault.

“I hope you weren’t getting up to what I was doing when I got love bites!”  There was a hint of a snigger from the barmaid. I’d just dragged my suitcase through the pub door and she could see me from the bar. She was only a year older than me, married to my dad’s cellar man and had a baby daughter. She was lovely. She’ll never know how much.

My story was more innocent than her story implied. Mine was no more than a dare in Opatija. Who can get the biggest, reddest love bite out of the four of us up for it. We had become friendly – and it was just friendly – with some lads from a posh boarding school. Everything  above board and respectable, apart from the awful love bites.

Following the passing of my mother and re-marriage of my father, our family dynamics had changed considerably and everything familiar and comfortable to me had gone. It is hard enough to be a teenage girl without complications of where you fit in, where you belong.

It wasn’t many minutes into my arrival before the proverbial hit the fan. My dad was speechless. Even he couldn’t stand my corner on this one. His wife, with a ‘How dare you do this to us’ headless chicken routine, throwing in to my dad, ‘I knew she’d do something, I told you.’

I don’t suppose it helped when I reassured them that the love bites will have gone long before I go back to school and meanwhile, I’ll dab them with Witch Hazel and hide them with makeup, better than I have done.

I didn’t fit in and I didn’t belong, but for the time being I had a good friend in the barmaid who was always there for me and wanted me to do well for myself, not be tied down like she thought she was. Life goes on and we’ve both done ok.

By the way, love bites are disgusting and I promise I haven't had any since!

I’ve chosen poems that are not love-bite related, but take me back to that summer and remind me of my fascination with the poets concerned.


Love’s Philosophy

The fountains mingle with the river
And the rivers with the ocean,
The winds of heaven mix forever
With a sweet emotion;
Nothing in the world is single,
All things by a law divine
In one spirit meet and mingle.
Why not I with thine? –

See the mountains kiss high heaven
And the waves clasp one another;
No sister-flower would be forgiven
If it disdained its brother;
And the sunlight clasps the earth
And the moonbeams kiss the sea:
What is all this sweet work worth
If thou kiss not me?

Percy Bysshe Shelley 1792 – 1822


She Walks In Beauty

She walks in beauty, like the night
Of cloudless climes and starry skies;
And all that’s best of dark and bright
Meet in her aspect and her eyes
Thus mellow’d to that tender light
Which heaven to gaudy day denies.

One shade the more, one ray the less,
Had half impair’d the nameless grace
Which waves in every raven tress,
Or softly lightens o’er her face;
Where thoughts serenely sweet express
How pure, how dear their dwelling-place.

And on that cheek, and o’er that brow,
So soft, so calm, yet eloquent,
The smiles that win, the tints that glow,
But tell of days in goodness spent,
A mind at peace with all below,
A heart whose love is innocent!

George Gordon Byron, Lord Byron 1788 - 1824


Thanks for reading, Pam x

Saturday, 12 February 2022

Papers

It takes quite something for the Mail and the Telegraph, those organs of the ideological right wing, to act as flypaper to entrap a Conservative Prime Minister, but that is what they are in the process of doing to our pestilential leader. 

They were happy to give space to a report sent to Boris's father by his Master in College at Eton (when BoJo was 17) stating: Boris really has adopted a disgracefully cavalier attitude to his classical studies. It is a question of priorities, which most of his colleagues have no difficulty in sorting out. Boris sometimes seems affronted when criticised for what amounts to a gross failure of responsibility (and surprised at the same time that he was not appointed Captain of the School for next half). I think he honestly believes it is churlish of us not to regard him as an exception, one who should be free of the network of obligation which binds everyone else.

As the boy, so the man - cavalier, gross failure of responsibility, believes himself to be free of the network of obligations, narcissistic, lacking in morals and scruples. "Wait", you say. "Lacking morals and scruples?" Indeed, sacked - if you didn't know - by his newspaper, the Times, when he was a journalist in the late 1980s for fabricating (i.e. making stuff up, including supposed quotes). Some might call that lying. Oh, and sacked again, this time by the Leader of the Conservatives after he had become an MP in the early 1990s, for lying about an extra-marital affair.

"But he has competencies", you urge. "He was Foreign Secretary." Indeed he was, the worst in living memory according to insiders at the Foreign Office. Not the least of his many gaffes in the role was the ill-advised statement he made about Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, which gave the Iranian government grounds for arresting and imprisoning her on a charge of espionage. She is still being held captive in Tehran five years on. When a leading FO diplomat was quizzed about Johnson he observed "...the thing you learn about Boris - everything is always about him." When pressed about Johnson as a possible PM he merely said "If he was not expected to run anything, it could work."

And so to Downing Street, with his last mistress now his wife, in a flat the cost of refurbishing which is still shrouded in confusion, and those lockdown busting parties which he said didn't happen. And if they did happen, he wasn't at them. And if he was at them, it was only once and for a few moments. And if it was more than once, they were work events with wine (a lot of it) and cheese (plenty of that). And never in his private flat, except on occasions. And never with people other than his immediate social bubble, though there is plenty of evidence to the contrary.

So the liar Boris Johnson, after weeks of winging it, has finally been served with papers by the Metropolitan Police asking him to account for his actions on a number of specified occasions in a number of specified locations to help them with their enquiries into how many times he broke the law - that is, rules his own government imposed upon the rest of us. I hope it will confirm how many lies upon lies Boris the Fly has peddled. May he never be allowed to escape the consequences.

Boris the Fly
My poem on topic...

Ambushed By Cake
(warning: may contain Nut-Nuts)
I didn't think it was a party, just another
work affair with cake and champagne.
Yes, there were thirty people there
including my wife and the woman
who's re-designing our flat. Am I 
paying for that? But I didn't think
it was a party. There were no strippers,
there was no cocaine, it was all very low-key.
All my affairs are always work affairs
with cake and champagne, just ask Carrie.

But I didn't think it was a party. I didn't think.
And now this. Those ridiculous headlines
in the press: Ambushed by Cake at Partygate.
The Telegraph and Mail for God's sake.
They're supposed to be on my side,
to have my back, the thankless hacks,
after all the work events they've been invited to!
At least it's clear it's not my fault. None of this.

I've seen those movies in which a hapless
mobster gets blown away by the gunman
hiding in the gateau - we have more class.
They all stood round me, smiling faces,
glasses raised, singing Happy Birthday
like I told everyone to do while washing their hands.
Is that what they were doing, metaphorically?
The ungrateful bastards, hoisting poor Boris
with his own petard. Have they no shame?
Did they forget I nearly died for them?
Fuck it! I lied to get here and I'll lie to stay.

Thanks for reading, S ;-)

Saturday, 5 February 2022

The Matrix

I've never seen the film The Matrix (Library of Congress cultural artefact though it may be), and the only thought I had in mind when first contemplating this theme a couple of weeks ago was 'matrix numbers', the alphanumeric codes stamped into the run-out grooves of vinyl records, by which the pressing plants used to identify their master disks. (Check it out if you have one such to hand. My ancient mono pressing of Beatles For Sale has the matrices XEX5034N and XEX5043N, unique to each side of the LP.)  However, I figured that wouldn't sustain your interest for long - and I must admit it wouldn't keep me hooked either!

Then along came that execrable woman Nadine Dorries (ironically Boris Johnson's latest Secretary of State for Culture), trying to deflect the flack from her beloved PM in his ignominy, by targeting the BBC in another round of Tory warmongering against the Corporation. That's it, I thought. I've had enough of this BBC-bashing. 

I'm nailing my colours firmly to the BBC radio mast in today's blog and celebrating its achievements, charter and worth to the nation. Licensed broadcasting commenced one hundred years ago, in October 1922. Originally this was radio transmission only and was initiated by a consortium of private wireless' manufacturers. Take up was slow and sporadic, which is why the British Broadcasting Corporation was conceived and given a Royal Charter in 1927. Television transmission joined radio programming from 1929 onwards and the service was publicly funded via a licence fee mechanism, allowing the service to be free from 'commercial' bias and constraints. The BBC was the first, and in my estimation, it remains the finest public service broadcasting (PBS) organisation in the world, the womb from which the best of British civilizing cultural and social values emerged through the 20th century. We should be as proud and protective of it as we are of that other great social institution, the NHS.


The license fee has always been set by the government of the day and approved by parliament. Effectively, it is a form of voluntary taxation.  Originally it was payable at a rate of 10 shillings (or 50 pence) per year for radio sets only by any household, school, hospital or workplace that possessed radio sets. After world war II the fee was increased to £2 per year for any household or institution possessing one or more television sets. From 1971 the radio component was dropped.

The monies raised annually by the TV licence fee cover 75% of the costs of the BBC. (The other 25% comes from sales of programmes around the world.) It should be borne in mind that this funding covers a vast range of activities and services: not only the many national and regional BBC television channels, their staff, studios, productions, technicians and transmissions, but also an even greater network of national, regional and local radio stations (staff, studios, productions et cetera), a fantastic Education division putting together programmes for schools and colleges, a worldwide network of professional news reporters, the BBC World Service, and now in the internet age, great state of the art online content covering news, arts, sport, music and much else. Personally, I think that's incredible value for money...the current cost of the licence fee working out at 43 pence per day!

Of course, recent Conservative governments have not looked kindly on the BBC. They don't like State enterprises on principle (there are no vast profits to be made there) and they feel the BBC has been unfairly biased against them - though the Corporation is duty-bound to remain apolitical, so that's simply a case of Tories not liking just criticism. The Conservative government has also tried to show the BBC in a bad light over the ending of free TV licenses for the over-75s, turning the institution into a political football. When it was announced that the free licence scheme was being scrapped and that the over-75s would have to pay in future, this was portrayed in the right-wing press as heartlessness by the BBC, when in fact the subsidy - which has been in place for decades - is a government subsidy, that the Tories have suddenly decided to revoke. It's not the BBC that are the bad guys here but Boris Johnson's government.

And now Nadine Dorries has decided that the licence fee will no longer increase in line with inflation, so that's another constraint on the Corporation in advance of its Royal Charter being up for review/ revision in 2027, with the strong hint that the licence fee may be abolished all together. 

Quite how the BBC will be able to continue to operate as the finest public service broadcasting organisation in the world much after its centenary is unclear to me. If it falls before the Tory onslaught to privatise and exploit every part of this country's infrastructure (as has happened with the deregulation and sell off in communications, energy, transport, utilities and is targeted to happen to health as well), then most of the institutions that have made this country great will have been decimated on the altar of petty greed. It's not a pretty prospect.


To finish, a new poem, not my finest effort by a margin, but intended to be evocative of those days in the late 1950s and early 1960s when most children whose families possessed a (black and white) TV set would watch what was on offer between getting home from school and teatime. It may get upgraded over time, but here's take one...

Hey Presto!
of course the world's not monochrome
though little we cared 
when we got home from school,
hit the on button to let the set warm up
and dropped to the floor
in that magical hour before tea
to stare in mesmerised wonder
at such fare as voiced-over animals
from Bristol Zoo, puppets on strings
mounting International Rescues, 
quiz shows with cabbages as booby prizes,
cowboys and indians, Judys in disguises,
singing piglets and talking horses,
all beamed through the airwaves
from transmitter to aerial until 
they emerged in our living rooms
to cast their spell on our rented TVs
(nobody bought their own in those days)
with flickering 405 or 625 lines thrown up 
onto the screen from a cathode ray tube,
binary choices, only two channels,
received pronunciation voicing the nation,
fuelling our imaginations, educating 
while entertaining - and always turned off
before we sat down to eat...

By the way, I've ordered myself a second-hand DVD copy of The Matrix, so I will watch the film when it arrives. I wonder if DVDs have a matrix number. Thanks for reading, S ;-)

Friday, 4 February 2022

Unplugging From The Matrix

‘To know yourself is to forget yourself.’
Dogen Zenji, a Buddhist Priest, writer, philosopher, and Zen Master.

It’s Monday morning, and I’m sat at the kitchen table with my laptop, feverishly deliberating on how best to construct a thought-piece on ‘unplugging from the matrix.’ To comprehensively do justice to such a concept in a single blog post is, I fear, far beyond my capability. There are simply too many rabbit-holes this concept can lead us down, and I am struggling to focus my aim.

Perhaps this concept, I muse, inevitably spawning more questions than answers, can be so mind-boggling, that it is better to explore it in the form of a narrative, as the turn-of-the-century film ‘The Matrix’ appropriately chose to do so. Perhaps, as native storytelling creatures, it is only through our myths can we best hope to examine this resident feeling deep inside of us– that which cannot be fully expressed through words - that there is something more to us than appears on the surface, that there is a greater part of us to be realised: a reality beyond the illusions we are living under.

For that is, as far as my interpretation goes, what it means to wake up from the matrix. It is one’s continual process of fostering an awareness of the illusory constructs that pose as reality, and extricating oneself from these illusions, layer by layer.


The late, great Ram Dass often used an analogy across countless lectures in his time. He would ask his audience to imagine that they had a control switch next to their eyes, which allowed them to view the world, and especially the people of it, through different channels of perception.

On channel one, you could perceive the physical bodies of others: whether they be male, female, old, young, fat, thin, handsome or ugly. This he would call ‘the matrix of individual differences on the physical plane.’ Those who lived exclusively in this channel might find themselves preoccupied with sexual gratification, or else worried about their weight, aging, sickness and deterioration to name a few examples.

Now, should you flip over to channel two, you would perceive other people by their mental bodies: their neuroses, elations, hopes, fears and anxieties. You would come to know people according to their personalities. We could call this channel ‘the matrix of individual difference on the psychological plane.’ Those who live in this reality, come to know their characters according to the socio-psychological roles they inhabit: ‘I struggle with depression,’ ‘I’m the black sheep of the family,’ ‘I’m a Marxist artist’, ‘I’m working on myself’, ‘God is dead, and I don’t care about anything.’

Many of us, navigating from one present moment to the next, rarely move past this channel when relating to others, or indeed ourselves. In this case, our psychological constructs often constitute the sum total of who we are. This ‘socio-psychological matrix’ could be seen as a deeper understanding of our identities compared to the ‘physical matrix’ – whereby the physical body of channel one is the subordinate vessel to the ‘real you’ over on channel two – though this perspective is also limited, and we could probe even deeper still.

After further flicking through channels, we might arrive at ‘the soul’ channel, where what you perceive when you look into another person’s eyes is another ‘being’ looking straight back at you. You are one soul recognising another soul. This could be termed ‘the matrix of recognising other beings on the astral or spiritual plane’. Here, the territory of perception shifts, and individual differences are demoted in their significance; as Ram Dass described it, they are merely ‘the packaging in which another being is encased.’

Another channel on from that, and when you look into someone else’s eyes, you see yourself looking at yourself looking straight back at yourself. God, The Creator, Universal Consciousness – adopt whichever term you’re comfortable with – is observing itself observing itself observing itself. Here then, in this matrix, we move beyond the illusion of separation. As Ram Dass put it: ‘On this plane, there is only one of us, one awareness in a multiplicity of forms. We are the One behind the Many, acting like the Many, in order to carry out this illusion.’

Now, most of us, not yet enabled with such extraordinary gifts of perception, can only ever intellectually conceptualise this latter matrix. Such is the sieve of the thinking mind. Though Ram Dass’s metaphor works well to point out that there are multiple matrices through which we might perceive. All of which make answering the question of ‘who am I?’ a little more complicated.

Taking each of these matrices into account, and to quote the indomitable Ram Dass one last time, an appropriate answer may very well be: ‘I am the One who becomes the Many, who has a unique set of factors to work out, through a unique astral, psychological and physical body.’

Hardly an answer to take with you speed dating, but still one worthy of contemplation. In this answer, we can appreciate that when we ask ourselves who we are, we are also asking what the true nature of reality is. At their core, the two questions are in fact the same question, albeit worded differently.


It is not for nothing that the plotline of the original Matrix film is centred on the protagonist becoming ‘the One.’ And on this journey to becoming the one, he must resolve himself of former identity constructs – dismantling them in order to revise his conception of who he is. Ultimately, our protagonist learns that he cannot realise his identity as the One unless he believes he is so.

That our protagonist is called Neo is no accident. The astute reader will notice that Neo is an anagram of one. However, ‘neo’ is also a suffix, meaning ‘the new of revived form’ of something, such as ‘neo’ in neogenesis: the regeneration of a previously formed substance. This connotation of regeneration and rebirth is a quality that will consistently characterise our protagonist throughout his story.

In the beginning of the film’s narrative – Neo is a mere alter-ego – our protagonist calls himself Thomas A. Anderson, the name of the socio-psychological construct by which he predominantly knows himself: his ego. He is portrayed as a conflicted pawn in the capitalist machine, cubicle-bound to office hours, dissatisfied with the cattle-trade of his everyday life, and grappling with this intuitive feeling that there must be something more.

This grappling provokes investigation, which eventually leads to his meeting Morpheus, a mentor-character, who offers Mr. Anderson the chance to answer this nagging intuition. He confirms that he has indeed been living under the roof of falsehoods and there is more to his world than he can presently conceive. Morpheus then presents him with a choice. He can choose to take the blue pill and resume his normal life experience as before, or he can take the red pill and choose to face the truth, no matter how uncomfortable the consequences.

Of course, it would be a dull film if he didn’t choose the red pill, and once he does so, he is unplugged - quite literally - from ‘the Matrix’ by his allies. We watch the graphic depiction of our hero’s awakening through his perspective, in which he wakes to find himself in an egg-shaped pod, encased within a membranous layer filled with a viscous, murky, blood-coloured soup. There is something analogous to the womb about it, and this reminiscence only extends when his limbs push through the membrane, splitting it open like an amniotic sack.

As he emerges from the primordial liquid which contains him, we discover he has a black cable running into his mouth and down his throat – suggestive of an umbilical cord – which he wrenches free, and with a greedy inhale, takes his first breath. He soon finds that there are more of these umbilical cables running leech-like into his arms, his legs, his spine and head. He takes note of his surroundings, and to his horror, discovers his pod is just one of thousands of such pods, in which fully grown adults are kept induced in comatose states, curled into foetal folds like unborn infants, quietly gestating.


Like recoiling serpents, the cables angrily hiss as they pop out of his body one by one. He collapses, and the pod opens beneath him, sending him down a long and winding chute in a flooding gush of soup, until he falls into a large body of water. The symbology is stark: our protagonist has only just been born. Not only born, but reborn.

The large body of water into which he lands, sinks, and is fully submerged, calls to mind the Christian tradition of baptism. Again, the notion of rebirth is reiterated. He has departed from one perspective and entered into another just as the newborn evacuates their womb dimension – which up until then represented their absolute conception of all reality – and enters into a larger world that supersedes the limits of their previously possible imaginings.

Our protagonist has now been freed into ‘the real world’. It is revealed to him that he has been living under a programmed illusion, a simulated reality, and that the majority of humanity are still plugged into their collective illusions, unconsciously enslaved to them, and asleep to the actualities of the real world. One of his new acquaintances, Cipher, even expresses an envy of this. After all, ignorance is bliss: to be unaware of an unpleasant fact is to be untroubled by it. For the real world is portrayed in apocalyptic vision: it is scarred, hostile, and full of suffering – and those few ‘awake’ human beings must daily struggle to survive. The truth might set us free, but rarely is it pretty.

To awaken from the matrix is to be liberated from all we once believed were firm and intransigent facts, but a steep learning curve accompanies such liberation. Our protagonist’s foundations are swiftly dismantled, he is thrown into free-fall, and his former ego dissolves as he desperately navigates the rules of his newfound territory. Now he is known as Neo, and with this new identity come fresh problems and great expectations. It has been prophesised that he is the chosen one, the saviour foretold to emancipate the rest of humankind from their mass delusion and suffering.

Arguably, Neo has merely left one matrix only to tumble into another.

He has expanded his awareness of self, only to find that his new understanding comes with its own challenges and hardships. On succeeding one purpose, he suddenly finds that the goalposts have shifted. His destiny is far greater than he could ever have imagined – a mirror image of the life journey itself - and he does not feel capable in his new role. Whilst others stow faith in him, he does not truly believe it in his heart.

It is only by the film’s climax, when the life of his mentor hangs in the balance, does he realise his prophesised identity as the One. Under the intense pressure of extreme circumstances, Neo is forced to make a choice. He is warned that the attempt to save Morpheus is an impossible undertaking, a suicide mission – and yet he chooses to do so regardless. He knows all too well that the only way to save his friend is through sacrificing himself – and he accepts that cost. Such acceptance propels him forward through a series of events culminating in Morpheus’ rescue and his forewarned death. Where Morpheus escapes, Neo is ambushed and shot down.

Miraculously, however, Neo wakes from his death-slumber and rises again. He is resurrected just as many prophesised saviours before him. His murderers turn to face him, bewildered at what has just occurred, and fire their weapons. Whereas Neo has dodged bullets earlier in the storyline – a hint of his superordinary potential – now he no longer needs to. This time, he simply raises his hand and freezes them mid-flight. His superordinary potential is finally fully realised.

On waking from death, the resurrected Neo has claimed his identity as the One. He is the One because he chose to be so. It was only through the willing sacrifice of his former self could he hope to regenerate and arrive at this realisation. Here he has left behind one realm of belief and stepped into another, thus, finally understanding the power of belief. Such power is demonstrated in his ability to stop bullets. It is belief that allows him to manipulate the Matrix as he so chooses, for it is a fluid construct and malleable to his will.

Our beliefs shape our reality. Or put otherwise, our believing in a reality makes it so. Our thoughts and perceptions inform our lived experiences. From the perspective of the individual, identity and reality are not conjoined twins: they are the same evolving organism. That Neo’s major shifts in both are represented as a process of rebirth and resurrection is a deliberate design. Death and birth are comparable as two sides of the same coin. Destruction is the flipside to reconstitution.

We are often changed by life events, whether orchestrated by our hand or not. Though it is telling that Neo willingly chooses to risk losing ‘himself’ twice-over. He knowingly trades everything he knows in order to know more; to expand his consciousness. First, in his initial unplugging from the matrix, and secondly, through sacrificing himself. We can be the architects of our own reinvention if we so choose, though we must understand that to reconfigure one’s beliefs demands a willing sacrifice of them; rebirth necessitates forgetting oneself.

Our beliefs inform our present realities, they are the raw materials from which our personal matrices are constructed. Your strength lies in whether you are awake to this fact or not. Where you are unconscious of it, there you are a slave to it. Where you are conscious, there you have the power to transcend it – to realise your potential and bend reality to your will.

The underlying message of the Matrix is not in simply transcending a single matrix, but in repeatedly migrating from one matrix to the next in order to reap one’s ultimate potential. It is the conscious effort of butting up against your barriers and limitations time and again, and the steady – often painful – regenerative process of dismantling them. The increasing of one’s consciousness is akin to gradually filling a room with light. The shadows recede into the corners, and what once lay in the darkness is exposed – even if it is not pleasant to look upon at first. We undress our imagined monsters until eventually, the shadows recede to such a point, that what you once mistook for a closed room is revealed to be an ever-expansive space, without walls and without boundaries.

In ruminating on unplugging, I wrote this poem. I chose to let it come out as it came, with as little doctoring as necessary. Possibly, I will choose to develop it further, I hope you enjoy it.

This prospering tongue found my mouth
just as the mute founded morse code,
another blameless and blinking oracle
expanding and contracting,
chattering over the aching desirable,
endlessly unachievable,
gasping lobotomy of thoughts
that eluded my grasp
once more.

Matryoshka, you keep bringing me down,
the summit of your toothless maw
are the roots of another mountain,
and I am levelled to the base,
grounded in an unculled lamb’s skin,
and like the devil’s needle
pinned into every manmade plan
the butcher’s knife still rests
in the chopping block,
waiting to cleanse the killing floor
with the water of the innocents.

Child, you are an ancient creature,
I can see it in your behaviour,
despite appearances
you have been here before,
closely listen, neonate,
your womb was an ill-fitting shoe,
and you, apostate, who
abandoned catacombs of doubt,
those bottled night-terrors;
memories sunken intravenously
of the tribes that no longer served you,
of the flesh that outlasted its tattoo,

Open your eyes,
raise your lips and ready your hands,
this is the scorched earth of the blind,
where the native tenancy live
under the roof of falsehoods:
such is the sieve of the thinking mind.

And on entering the oldest,
most prolific and largest
cult yet alive,
where the local sport
is in plucking the wings off of flies
and turning them into walks,
you would do well to remember:
we did not make it
to the ends of our world
by believing in the monsters
drawn at the edges of our maps.

Child, you are irradiated with it,
the glow of a liberated spirit,
and you will find these strung-up adults
knotted in webs of their own making
will feed from you, exact
from your atomic bloom
and bed into your ungoverned vision,
and at the last hurdle,
dismantle and correct it
with the blackest of envies
for you are the vacancy
of an unaltered spot,
the precarious junction
of pure and ambrosial infancy
to which they are magnetised
as relentlessly and as inevitably
as the wandering wisps of the unfinished
are doomed to starve forevermore.

Thanks for reading, Josh.

Wednesday, 2 February 2022

The Matrix?

The Matrix is considered one of the best science fiction films of all time and was selected for preservation in the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress for being culturally, historically and aesthetically significant. It was written by the directors, the Wachowski sisters, specifically for film. But I want to take the term Science Fiction and give my top ten of actual books made into films.

10 Soylent Green. Based on a 1966 science fiction novel Make Room! Make Room! by Harry Harrison. It starred Charlton Heston, Leigh Taylor-Young and Edward G. Robinson and was directed by Richard Fleischer. It tells the story of New York in the year 2022, when the population has swollen to 80 million, and people live in the streets and line up for their rations of water and Soylent Green which is plankton. Maybe.

9 Minority Report. Based on a story by Philip K. Dick and directed by Stephen Spielberg the film follows a police officer (Tom Cruise) in the year 2054 working in the PreCrime department, which arrests people before they commit crimes foreseen by psychic "precogs."

still from Andrei Tarkovsky's Solaris
8 Solaris. I’ve read that the author of this film, Stanislaw Lem, is the best science fiction writer ever, and Solaris is his most famous book. I much prefer the 1972 version of the film which was co-written and directed by Andrei Tarkovsky. The plot centres on a space station orbiting the fictional planet Solaris, where a scientific mission has stalled because the three scientists have fallen into emotional crises. Psychologist Kris Kelvin travels to the station to evaluate the situation, only to encounter the same mysterious phenomena as the others.

7 Frankenstein. Written by Mary Shelley in 1818. There’s no point in going over the story as it has developed a life of its own. But I would urge you to read the actual book it is fantastic. However, I would point you to the spoof version ‘Young Frankenstein’ directed by Mel Brooks. The screenplay was co-written by Brooks and Gene Wilder. Wilder also starred in the lead role as the title character, a descendant of the infamous Dr. Victor Frankenstein. Walk this way.

6 Arrival. Based on Ted Chiang's novella, Story of Your Life and directed by Denis Villeneuve, this story follows linguist Louise Banks (Amy Adams) when she is tasked with communicating with aliens that have arrived on Earth in a massive, black spacecraft. But it’s more than that.

5 Dune. The first in the series of novels entitled the Dune saga written by Frank Herbert. I remember being absorbed by this back in the 60s. I wonder if I still would be. The story is based around a future thousands of years away and concerns various empires feuding. Sort of. The current film has received rave reviews. I haven’t seen it yet. Previous ones have been turkeys.

still from Sir Ridley Scott's Blade Runner
4 Blade Runner. Based on Philip K. Dick's book Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? and directed by Ridley Scott in 1982. The film is set in a Los Angeles of 2019, in which synthetic humans known as replicants are bio-engineered to work on space colonies. When a fugitive group of advanced replicants led by Roy Batty ( Rutger Hauer, ) escapes back to Earth, burnt-out cop Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford) reluctantly agrees to hunt them down. It’s the atmosphere of it all and Batty’s amazing speech at the end ‘I've seen things you people wouldn't believe....’

3 Alien. Daniel Thomas O'Bann wrote the screenplay for the 1979 film, adapted from a story he wrote with Ronald Shusett and it was directed by Ridley Scott. And it stars Sigourney Weaver as Ripley (gulp). I presume that you will know the plot but just think on that scene with John Hurt. In 2002, Alien was deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" by the Library of Congress and was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry.

2 The Martian. The book was written by Andy Weir and published in 2014. ‘A book I just couldn’t put down! It has the very rare combination of a good, original story, interestingly real characters and fascinating technical accuracy’ so says Astronaut Chris Hadfield, Commander of the International Space Station’. I’d go further and say it’s the best science fiction book I’ve read. It is nail bitingly thrilling. I stayed up until 2 am to finish it and my heart was thumping. The trouble is that it is so good I don’t want to see the film although it has great reviews.

still from Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey
1 2001: A Space Odyssey. Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick wrote this together although it was based on Clarke’s 1951 short story The Sentinel. I saw the film in 1968 on probably a Friday night in Birmingham and went back on Saturday, Sunday and Monday. It was the Ultimate Trip. I don’t know how many times I have watched it. Everything about the film is perfect. I say no more. Except Daisy, Daisy give me your answer do.

That’s my list and I’m sure people would disagree. And here’s a poem on the very subject:

Science Fiction

Once upon a time
density span and speed
L = (1/2) ρ v2 s CL

as beautiful as a 747
departing the fact
of Terminal 3

guided past Control Towers
into that crumpled paperback
Asimov or Clarke
where this is a game
played in a maze
by something beyond
Tuesday Manchester

only rain makes sense
blurring binoculars
on the airport car park
spotters casually scribbling
the number of Flight 6122
reaching for coffee
as wheels leave the ground

to a single gasp
lost in the roar

of elegant lines
where L is the force
that lifted wings
in text book problems
that now and then
came to the same conclusion
as answers in the back
where total disbelief
that I’d got it right
equals eight thousand hundredweight
turning south over Wilmslow.

(First published in The Journal, 2019)

eight thousand hundredweight getting airborne

Thanks for reading, Terry.

Tuesday, 1 February 2022

The Matrix - Blackhouses Village

‘Matrix – the cultural, social or political environment in which something develops.’

My first glimpse of Gearrannan Blackhouse Village on the Isle of Lewis was breathtaking, almost tearful. We were up a slight hill by the coast looking down on the cluster of thatched, shallow built stone cottages and a lane weaving through to the shore. It was idyllic. I imagined being settled there with all my family, away from the stresses and strains and everything I would like to escape from in the real world. Through my rose-tinted glasses we would have an endless supply of provisions and enough skills between us to look after each other. How cosy and warm it would be, by the fire, inside a cottage with its 3ft wide walls.  I wondered what the attraction was to the original settlers. It’s windy on the Atlantic coast. Surrounding hills offered some, but not much shelter. As I remember, the last inhabitants were re-housed as recently as the early 1970s. The cottages are renovated and well maintained. One is now a café and gift shop, two or three are museums showing visitors like us how people lived. More like how they survived. The other cottages are holiday accommodation. The revenue helps with the up-keep and nothing has been spoiled. There is running water and electricity. The village is perfectly saved for the likes of us to have a tangible insight into life through the ages, and on-going with the successful holiday lets. From an early settlement it has developed into the modern world and continues to be a conservation area. Perhaps I’ll have an opportunity to stay there and live my dream for a moment.


Matrix – ‘Something, such as a situation or a set of conditions, in which something else develops or forms the complex social matrix in which people live their lives.’

I found this, by Amy Lowell:

The Matrix

Goaded and harassed in the factory
That tears our life up into bits of days
Ticked off upon a clock which never stays,
Shredding our portion of Eternity,
We break away at last, and steal the key
Which hides a world empty of hours; ways
Of space unroll, and Heaven overlays
The leafy, sun-lit earth of Fantasy.
Beyond the ilex shadow glares the sun,
Scorching against the blue flame of the sky.
Brown lily-pads lie heavy and supine
Within a granite basin, under one
The bronze-gold glimmer of a carp; and I
Reach out my hand and pluck a nectarine.

                                      Amy Lowell 1874 – 1925

 

Thanks for reading, Pam x