written and posted by members of Lancashire Dead Good Poets' Society

Showing posts with label Cameras. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cameras. Show all posts

Tuesday, 27 July 2021

Biorhythms - Life Cycles


Long before speed cameras were installed on the A583, my personal best driving time from my little house in Layton to my place of work in Preston was seventeen minutes. This was early morning, summertime and green traffic lights. I promise I kept to the speed limits until I was on open road, in that quiet window between the factory workers heading to British Aerospace or GEC setting off for Strand Road, and regular morning traffic building up. I liked to arrive at work for seven-forty-five. I liked to be one of the first in.

One morning I was thwarted by incidents beyond my control. A minor collision between a car and a van had occurred on the bend at Lea, blocking the road and putting traffic in both directions at a standstill for ages. This was in the old days, before reaching for a mobile phone was second nature. As time marched on and despite the soothing tone of Terry Wogan keeping me company on the radio, I began to feel stressed. Out of three key holders, I was the only one expected in work that day. The other two both lived in Blackpool and would have had the same problem as me, had they tried to get there. All I could do was wait. Eventually, things were moving and I managed to fly up Riversway, lucky green lights, all the way to work and a car park full of patiently waiting staff. I gave apologies and explained the situation, which they were aware of as someone had heard a traffic report on local radio.

“Bad biorhythms day, love?” A colleague offered sympathy when we were inside the building, unlocking doors and switching off the alarm. She made me laugh, if nothing else. Biorhythms had become popular at that time, mid-eighties. I remember someone having a book about it and learning how to work out biorhythm cycles. I just thought it was a fad, I still do. I believe that my thoughts and feelings are all to do with how I might deal with something, be it stressful or otherwise, and not where I might be up to on a biorhythm cycle. Of course, I might have it all wrong.

From Wikipedia – “The biorhythm theory is the pseudoscientific idea that our daily lives are significantly affected by rhythmic cycles with periods of exactly 23, 28 and 33 days, typically a 23 day physical cycle, a 28 day emotional cycle and a 33 day intellectual cycle. The idea was developed by Wilhelm Fliess in the late 19th century and was popularised in the United States in late 1970s. The proposal has been independently tested and consistently no validity for it has been found.”

There it is. The cynical side of me is amused that a man decided to refer to the 28 day cycle as ‘emotional’.  

Biorhythm readings, predictions, whatever is the best description, are available online. On the strength of nothing more than my date of birth, this reading came back in a nanosecond: ‘Physical’ – Efficiency is high. Use it. ‘Emotional’ – There will be light at the end of the tunnel. Sitting in your shell is not much fun. ‘Intellectual’ – Getting better with intellectual skills, if work needs concentration, it’s good to do it within the next ten days.

Actually, I’m having lots of fun sitting in my shell, being efficient and doing my own thing, be it intellectual or not. Everyone who shares my date of birth will have the same reading, just like a horoscope.

A bad biorhythms day as suggested by my colleague all those years ago means nothing. Sat in a traffic jam, concerned about staff, unable to let them know and feeling tense because of it is all there was to it.

My haiku:

Tell me if it’s true,

All this biorhythm stuff,

I don’t believe it.

 

Don’t bother checking,

Nothing more than horoscope.

Take life as it comes.

 

PMW 2021

Thanks for reading, take care, Pam x

 

Sunday, 28 July 2013

Birth Rights

01:34:00 Posted by Unknown , , , , , 2 comments
George. It was a name that featured fairly prominently in our ‘potential children of the future list’. Links in the family, quite traditional, not as common these days… and then just like that, it was gone.
In the next few years the name is going to boom- there will be a George, a Georgie and probably a G in every classroom in the land. There’ll be so many the ever so sure of himself chancellor will probably think he had something to do with it. Well, Mr O, there is a smarter and more sensible bet for future leader of the country- and in a few years the little bugger is going to learn to talk.
Yes, the news of the royal birth is big- in the scheme of things. It was good, big news for about fifteen minutes- although what we’ve actually had is big headlines for an entire week of rolling news. There wasn’t a place you could turn in the UK this week that didn’t have some sort of acknowledgement there had been a successor born.
By rights given at birth, this child will go on to do everything he could ever dream of. He will have to go to work one day, he will have to behave in a certain manner and keep himself acting like an upstanding member of society if he is to live this lifestyle but, royal privilege aside, Prince George also has the right be like any other child in the country born lucky enough to have supportive and good hearted parents. HRH will just be a little bit ahead- with a guaranteed income and guaranteed position, as and when a vacancy comes around. He won’t ever, I suppose, have to spend a day fracking for a living.
But, those were not the only rights that the little prince was given at birth. We are all born free, innocent until proven guilty and with control over our own personal lives. We have the right to remain silent- we have the right to protest- we have the right to learn. Whilst I’m running a list off, can anyone confirm if we still have privacy?

I would hate to live in a world where it was deemed the norm to spy over someone’s fence or take photos of them in their car. If I was having a family there’d be no cameras, no visitors, no nothing without my say so. It is perhaps the firmest thing I would take a ‘not in my back yard’ approach to- (after the carving up of the earth’s core in order to turn the heating up). It would be no time for a Hugh Grant backlash and high time for a Russell Crowe style response. When Catchphrase Cameron announced his idea for a backdoor internet naughty list last week, he claimed it was for protection of children- and this same week we had a media scrum all after a royal baby photo. It hardly seems proper that children born tomorrow will have literally no rights at all. If the babies of today have to go through this and their parents computers have to be covertly vetted, where really is it going to end? Badly, I’d say.

What Right.
Give us your first born son, we want him now
We want to know the weight, the when, the how
We want the pictures, want a royal wave
Let’s get him out to front and centre stage.

We want to know his names- first, middle, last
and any other detail we might ask
We want him out on show, not tucked away
Could someone please confirm the Christening day?

We want to know which blankets in the pram
Will warm this little king with tiny hands
What was that brand of click in place car seat
And can we get all this on our high streets?

We want his face across our magazines
With every bit of trivia we’ve gleaned
We want his family tax records on show
We’ll buy it- we just really want to know

One last thing- if there’s walking in the park
Or public, please don’t do it after dark
We’ve imposed enough without needing the flash
We’d hate to be at fault if someone crashed.

Thanks for reading,
S