written and posted by members of Lancashire Dead Good Poets' Society

Showing posts with label Kurt Vonnegut. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kurt Vonnegut. Show all posts

Saturday, 20 October 2018

Loneliness Limited

Is anyone here a fan of the writings of the American author Kurt Vonnegut? He was quite fashionable in the 1960s and early 1970s but I think his cachet is not what it was. In 1976 he published his eighth novel, Slapstick, which carried the sub-title Lonesome No More!  It was a semi-autobiographical take on the theme of loneliness, both individual and societal. It was roundly panned by the critics for being short on, well, everything really: characterisation, plot, substance - hardly a novel as we know it, they said, slapdash at best in execution.

Vonnegut's sister Alice had died of cancer in 1958 just two days after her husband had been killed in a railway accident. Kurt and his wife, who already had three children of their own, adopted Alice's three orphaned sons. Twenty years further on, Slapstick emerged, loosely science-fiction and largely about Vonnegut's relationship with his lost sister. In later years, he conceded it was not one of his best efforts (assigning it a retrospective D), but at the time he had this to say about it:
"This is the closest I will ever come to writing an autobiography. I have called it Slapstick because it is grotesque, situational poetry - like the slapstick film comedies, especially those of Laurel and Hardy, of long ago. It is what life feels like to me."

Indeed, he dedicated the book to Arthur Stanley Jefferson and Norvell Hardy. Life as bizarre and cruelly comedic just about summed up Vonnegut's unflinching world-view and yet he was (in my estimation) supremely principled and humane, believing that we didn't necessarily have many positive factors going for us as a species apart from an ability to be sociable and kind to one another.

Alice doesn't live here anymore
My sole reason for dragging mention of Slapstick (or Lonesome No More!) into today's blog is because one of the central concepts of the novel was a plan to limit  loneliness.

Kurt and his sister Alice, transfigured in the book as the twins Wilbur and Eliza Swain, hatched a notion designed to put an end to the emptiness at the heart of American life, to remedy a nation's loneliness and sense of alienation. They proposed that all citizens should be assigned a new middle name made up of a random natural object coupled with a random number between 1 and 20 (e.g. Stephen Tangerine-11 Rowland). Everyone with the same randomly-assigned middle name would become de facto cousins and everyone with the same middle name and number would become siblings, thus creating great supra-natural families with a duty of companionship to each other.

Wilbur Swain ran for the US presidency under the slogan Lonesome No More! with the twins' scheme as the basis of his manifesto - an interesting idea, in that it would transcend culture, ideology, race.  It was a winning ticket. Swain was elected in a landslide victory with a mandate to Make America Relate again. Even as the rest of western civilisation collapsed under the scourge of its own careless and destructive greed, survivors in the USA strove selflessly to help their 'cousins' and 'siblings' to feel some sense of connection, worth and hope for the future - a sustaining group mentality.

Today's somewhat whimsical poem materialised after going to see the movie First Man at my local Odious Cinema this evening. The film, about Neil Armstrong and the progress of NASA's program to achieve a successful manned landing on the moon, made rivetting and at times uncomfortable viewing but I can recommend it. By coincidence, there was the afore-mentioned Kurt Vonnegut in some original black and white newsreel from the era berating the huge sums of money that the USA was ploughing into the 'space race' - he reckoned that just a fraction of it could have been used to make New York City a more habitable place.


I'm not usually a fan of personification, but it just happened. This may not be the poem's final form. Let me know what you think...

Orphaned Moon
Antoine called it right.
Space is the loneliest place.
The Milky Way's
light-years-away lustre
in reality a dysfunctional cluster
of fast-diverging gas and dust,
while closer to home
the monochrome moon
looms cold and lonely,
a bride waiting to be groomed.

Rejected at birth,
if indeed Earth were ever
her mother at all
(oh, she has her doubts),
the orphaned moon
has never dared to show
her still more scarred
and darker face, as though
to do so would occasion
an unpardonable fall from grace.

Imagine then her apprehensive thrill
when the first bold astronauts
traversed the invisible umbilical
that ties her still to foster Earth
and landed on the bright side,
kicking up her powder
in contemplative wonder.

Were they, she pondered,
desirous of her heavenly body
for its own sake?
Had they come to woo her truly
or merely to screw her
for all she was worth?
And would such exploitation,
if so it proved,
be an acceptable ill to be borne
for the love she craved?
Expiation perhaps
for whatever bad she had done
to deserve millennia of being shunned?

In the end, those astronauts
merely scratched her surface briefly,
then departed whence they'd come
leaving the poor orphaned moon,
all expectations floored,
monochromatically numb
and infinitely lonelier than before.


Thanks as ever for reading my musings and stuff. Stay connected, S ;-)

Saturday, 25 March 2017

Turn Of Events

Sometimes these blogs almost write themselves (if you know what I mean). At the beginning of the week I was trying to figure out how I would interpret Turn Of Events, but the terrorist attack in London on Wednesday has pointed the way (as it did for Adele and Kath on Thursday and Friday).

What turned Adrian Elms, later Adrian Ajao and ultimately Khalid Masood into a terrorist? By all accounts the 52-year old had led a problematic, often violent life. He was brought up in leafy Kent among affluent surroundings. He was a bit of a tearaway as a teenager. His first wife divorced him because he was a 'controlling psychopath' and she lived in fear of him. His mother had had nothing to do with him for the last twenty years. He had a string of petty criminal convictions and had spent four terms in prison, during one of which he converted to Islam.

Normally when a troubled soul adopts a religious belief it is in an attempt to give greater meaning to his/her life, to become a better if not a different person. Is that how it started for Mr Elms/Ajao/Masood? Did his reading of the Koran (one of the great religious treatises) not teach him that all life is holy?

Faith systems are all very well in their place but what is required is a questing and a questioning spirit and a sense of perspective. One of the dangerous tendencies of fanatical organisations is to blur the divide between the religious and secular worlds, imposing the strictures of the former on the latter. Such organisations, like any tyranny, can only succeed in doing so through a combination of unquestioning adherence and sheer terror. It seems they usually gain a foothold via the former and then stamp down with the latter. That's certainly the impression I have of how the Taliban and the ISIS caliphate work; ditto fundamental branches of Christianity in less enlightened times and totalitarian secular states in the 20th century.

It has to be assumed that the man was disturbed, imbalanced, highly impressionable to be so taken in by the twisted mantra of religious fundamentalism that he would launch a one-man crusade against the seat of British democracy. Maybe he was living out a delusional fantasy and the fifty dead and injured souls were just unfortunate collateral in his movie. Kurt Vonnegut, bless him, would have put it all down to a surfeit of bad chemicals. Maybe Elms/Ajao/Masood was in need of a little medication. By all reasonable assessments he would be classified as a fairly fucked-up individual, albeit an intelligent one. Clever fucked-up individuals are the hardest to counter, as events at Westminster showed.

Did he feel that we, as a community, had failed him somehow? Did he even think of us anymore as his community or was he striking a blow in some kind of misguided holy war against foul Britannia? We shall have to wait and see. We may never find out.

The important things in the aftermath of such a heinous act are two-fold: to stand strong and to learn. Unity in the community is what is required. If anybody can give the appropriate lead to Londoners, Sadiq Khan is the man. As for learning the lessons, that's more complicated. The security services will analyse and make changes to procedures. Society as a whole needs to think about why such things happen at all and we probably need to take a good look at ourselves in the first place. None of the learnings will be easy. Some of them will not be pleasant.


Today's poem tries to give a sense of the senselessness of the destructive urge as perpetrated on a daily basis in parts of the world less liberal and ordered than our own.

The Speed Of Dark
The space where my car stood
was ominously empty,
a heart-stopping moment;
cats and chickens patrolling
where its shadow should have been.
No sign, no clue.
If you were in my shoes
you'd want to kick them off.

'You can have any colour
as long as it's black,'
the salesman had said,
that rusty old Henry Ford joke.
It's called giving the people
what you want.
Fifty down and fifty a month
for as long as the future might be.
Fool poverty -
limited options based on limited means.

Stolen to order for those
whose snake words squirt venom
into troubled souls,
it was driven racing away,
packed with destruction
and pressed into carnage.
I watched it explode
again and again on the evening news,
my trusty old Henry Ford joke,
killing fifty, maiming fifty more;
heart-stopping moments.

It's called giving the people
what they deserve
by those arrogant zealots
who are breaking the bonds of humanity...

Never underestimate the speed of dark.


Thanks for reading. I wish you a peaceful week, S ;-)